| Pages: [1] |
1. BROKEN contracts - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Quazal Atreides wrote: no search abiltiy is available on contracts even if you "search for one by find existing" it always come back with "Your search for Typhoon Blueprint was sadly unfruitful. Please enter another search term." regardless o...
- by Marcus Trial - at 2014.07.31 12:50:00
|
2. Can we have Tooltips 2.0, please? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
First of all: I appreciate you guys trying to make EVE prettier and improve the games UI. However, the new tooltips feel kinda rushed and not well thought out. I don't need to be told that each of the 5 or so squares in my overview is a "station"...
- by Marcus Trial - at 2014.05.15 21:16:00
|
3. Announcement:A message regarding vandalism of the EVE Universe Monument - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
mkint wrote: Hmm... some of the guys involved turned themselves in, and still got perma-banned? Not condoning what they did in any way whatsoever, but doesn't such a harsh response disincentivize people in the future from admitting to what they...
- by Marcus Trial - at 2014.05.07 16:13:00
|
4. T2 Transport ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rowells wrote: Marcus Trial wrote: You're already able to bridge transport ships around. The keyword is black ops battleships. As for blockade runners, they already have improved warp core strength, no need for nullification there. You wanna...
- by Marcus Trial - at 2014.02.01 20:29:00
|
5. T2 Transport ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
You're already able to bridge transport ships around. The keyword is black ops battleships. As for blockade runners, they already have improved warp core strength, no need for nullification there. You wanna get past a camped pipe, use an intercept...
- by Marcus Trial - at 2014.02.01 13:25:00
|
6. Hi Sec POCO - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Kaivar Lancer wrote: Wow. CCP buffs null-sec bears again. And another hisec bear is bitching. C'mon, keep the tears flowing. On another note: if indeed all hisec POCOs are going to be "divvied up" between the oh so big and bad nullsec power...
- by Marcus Trial - at 2013.09.27 02:11:00
|
7. Anchoring for ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Proclus Diadochu wrote: If this idea were to progress, I'd recommend that the module require some sort of injection system. Might aswell, since miner bumping is such a big deal, or so I've heard. What I mean is something (We'll call it Electro...
- by Marcus Trial - at 2013.08.17 23:08:00
|
8. Anchoring for ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Draconigea wrote: Marcus Trial wrote: Which would make mining with an anchored ship into anchorable secure containers impossible, since you wouldn't be able to anchor your ship closer then 5000m to another anchored object. Great idea. Al...
- by Marcus Trial - at 2013.08.17 22:24:00
|
9. Anchoring for ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Draconigea wrote: Job Valador wrote: anchor 5-6 ships around a miner and he cant leave the belt unless he logs off -1 Like anchoring with containers, you need to keep 5000m distance. Maldiro Selkurk wrote: i think bumping should ha...
- by Marcus Trial - at 2013.08.17 21:59:00
|
10. Petition for system name change for Vile Rat - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If naming systems/stations after him or creating a monument for him are considered "over the top", why not put his name into the description of one of the soon-to-come new destroyers? Similar to the description of the rattlesnake: "Origin of the ...
- by Marcus Trial - at 2012.09.12 16:52:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |